# Monday, November 23 Today: last lecture. Note that (some) videos will be available online, see Youtube channel. ## Cohomology of Frobenius Kernels Let $r=1$, and consider $H^0(G_1; k)$. For $p > h$, we know $H^{2\cdot} = k[\mathcal{N}]$ and zero otherwise. What is known for $ph$, we have $\mathcal{N}_1(\lieg) = \mathcal{N}$. Taking $\liegl_n$, this is matrices whose $p$th power is zero. Note that the Frobenius map is still a derivation in characteristic $p$. :::{.theorem title="Jantzen, 1986"} \[ \mspec(H^\cdot(G_1; k) ) \cong \mathcal{N}_1(\lieg) .\] ::: :::{.theorem title="Carlson-Lin-Nakano-Parshall, UGA VIGRE"} For some $G\dash$orbit $\mathcal{O}$ in $\mathcal{N}$, \[ \mathcal{N}_1(\lieg) = \bar{\mathcal{O}} ,\] i.e. it is the closure of some $G\dash$orbit. In particular, $\mathcal{N}_1(\lieg)$ is irreducible. ::: For $\lambda\in X(T)$, set \[ \Phi_\lambda \da \ts{ \alpha\in\Phi \st \inner{\lambda+\rho}{\alpha\dual} \in p\ZZ } .\] When $p$ is good, there exists $w\in W$ such that $w(\Phi_\lambda) = \Phi_J$ for some $J \subset\Delta$. \todo[inline]{Something about being on or off a wall, and conjugating?} :::{.example title="?"} We can determine which $p$ are good for each type: - $A_n$: $p$ is always good. - $B_n$: $p\neq 2$ - $C_n$: $p\neq 2$ - $D_n$: $p\neq 2$ - $E_6$: $p\neq 2$ - $E_7$: $p\neq 2, 3$ - $E_8$: $p\neq 2, 3,5$ - $F_4$: $p\neq 2, 3$ - $G_2$: $p\neq 2, 3$ ::: :::{.conjecture} Let $p$ be a good and $w(\Phi_0) = \Phi_J$ for some $J \subseteq \Delta$. By NPV, $\mathcal{N}_1(\lieg) = G \cdot \mu_J$. Assuming that $p\notdivides (X(T): \ZZ \Phi)$, then - $H^{2\cdot}(G; k) = k[\mathcal{N}_1(\lieg)]$ - $H^{2\cdot + 1}(G; k) = 0$. ::: :::{.remark} This is a natural generalization of $p>h$. There is some situational evidence for this to be true: 1. For $p=h-1$, we have $\mathcal{N}_1(\lieg) = \bar{\OO_{\reg}}$ and the conjecture is true. 2. For quantum groups, $H^\cdot(U_q(\lieg); \CC )$ and it is again true. \todo[inline]{Something about BNPP} ::: :::{.remark} Some key points: 1. By the Gravert-Riemenschneider theorem, for $k= \bar{\FF_p}$, \[ R^{i>0} \ind_{P_J}^{C_r} S^\cdot(u_J^*) = 0 .\] 2. Normality of $\mathcal{N}_1(\lieg)$. A fact about something from earlier: the ring of regular functions on springer resolution equal to those on the nilpotent cone. ::: ## Support Varieties Very common in modern mathematics. Define $R \da H^\wait(G_1; k)$, which is a finitely generated algebra. Note that $R$ acts on $\ext_{G_1}^\wait(M, M)$, which is finitely generated over $R$. So what is the support of this module? Define $V_{G_1}(M) \da \mspec\qty{R/J_M}$, where $J_M \da \Ann_R \ext_{G_1}^\wait(M, M)$. :::{.conjecture title="Jantzen, 1986"} Let $p$ be good and $\lambda \in X(T)_+$ be a dominant weight. Consider $\Phi_\lambda$ ad $w\in W$ such that $w(\Phi_\lambda) = \Phi_J$ for some $J \subseteq \Delta$. Then \[ V_{G_1} (H^0(\lambda)) = G\cdot \mu_J .\] ::: :::{.remark} Now proved! Jantzen proved for type $A_n$, and Nakano-Parshall-Vella proved it in general in 2002. ::: :::{.remark} For tilting modules, there is a conjecture for $V_G(T(\lambda))$ (Humphreys conjecture). Type $A_n$ with $p>h+1$ was verified by W. Harelstry, and $p=2$ by Cooper. This is still open, but is known for quantum groups and unknown for general algebraic groups. :::