# Wednesday February 26th ## Radicals For $R$ a ring, we defined $\nil(R) \definedas \theset{x\in R \suchthat \exists n\in \NN,~ x^n = 0} \normal R$. We had a theorem: $$\nil(R) = \intersect_{\mfp\in\spec(R)} \mfp$$ Definition (Radical of an Ideal) (Flat Implies Torsionfree in Domains) : For $I\normal R$, we define $\rad(I) = \theset{x\in R \suchthat \exists n,~ x^n \in I} \supseteq I$. Fact : $I \normal R$. To see this, note that for any $I \normal R$, then $\nil(R/I) \normal R = \rad(I)$. Definition (Radical Ideals) : $I$ is a *radical ideal* iff $I = \rad(I)$. Example : Prime ideals are radical. Definition (Closure Operators) : Define a *closure operator* $\ell: I \mapsto \rad(I)$. In general, if $(X, \leq)$ is a poset, then a Moore closure operator is a map $c: X\to X$ satisfying 1. $c(c(x)) = c(x)$ 2. $x \leq c(x)$ 3. $x\leq y \implies c(x) \leq c(y)$. This is most often applied to $X$ the family of subsets of a set $A$ and $\leq$ subset inclusion. Note that this doesn't completely correspond to a topological closure, since this would also require preservation of intersections. > Related to Galois connections, not covering in this class but good for a final topic. We can produce a nice characterization: $$ \rad(I) = \nil(R/I) = \intersect_{\mfp \in R/I} \mfp = \intersect_{\mfp \supseteq I} \mfp $$ Exercise (easy) : If $\theset{I_i}$ is any family of radical ideals, then $\intersect_i I_i$ is radical. Exercise : Let $R=\ZZ$. What are the radical ideals? $(0), (p)$, but $(p^2)$ is not radical -- i.e. $(0), (n)$ for $n$ squarefree. Fact : $I$ is radical iff $R/I$ is reduced. Noting that by the CRT, $\ZZ/n\ZZ \cong \prod \ZZ/ p_i^{a_i} \ZZ$, which is reduced iff $a_i = 1$ for all $i$. If $R$ is a PID, $\pi_1 \cdots \pi_r$ radical ideals, then $(\pi_1 \cdots \pi_r)$ nonassociate prime elements ?? Exercise : Let $R$ be a ring, $\mfp_1 \neq \mfp_2$ prime ideals. 1. Must $\mfp_1 \mfp_2$ be radical? 2. If $\mfp_1 + \mfp_2 + R$, then $\mfp_1 \mfp_2 = \mfp_1 \intersect \mfp_2$, and is thus radical. > Product may be smaller than intersection in general. Proposition (Algebraic Properties of Radicals) : Let $I, J \normal R$. a. $I \subset \rad(I)$, $\rad(\rad(I)) \subset \rad(I)$, and $I\subset J \implies \rad(I) \subset \rad(J)$. b. $\rad(IJ) = \rad(I\intersect J) = \rad(I) \intersect \rad(J)$ c. $\rad(I+J) = \rad( \rad(I) + \rad(J) )$ d. $\rad(I) = R \iff I = R$ e. $\rad(I^n) = \rad(I)$ for $n\geq 1$ f. If $R$ is Noetherian and $J\subset \rad(I)$, then $J^n \subset I$ for some $n\geq 1$. So for Noetherian rings, two radicals are equal iff powers of each ideal land in the other. Proof (of (b)) : $IJ \subseteq I\intersect J$ and thus $\rad(IJ) \subset \rad(I\intersect J)$. If $x\in \rad(I \intersect J)$, there exists an $n$ such that $x^n \in I \intersect J$. Then $x^{2n} = x^n x^N \in IJ \implies x\in \rad(IJ)$. Proof (of b) : Since $I\intersect J \subset I, J$, we have $\rad(I\intersect J) \subset \rad(I) \intersect \rad(J)$. If $x\in \rad(I) \intersect \rad(J)$, then $x^n\in I, x^m \in J$ for some $n, m$, so $x^{m+n} \in I\intersect J \subset \rad(I \intersect J)$. Proof (of (f)) : By replacing $R$ with $R/I$, assume $I = (0)$, then $J\in \nil(R)$ and since $R$ is Noetherian, $J$ is nilpotent and $J^n=(0)$ for some $n$. So we simplify things by passing from $I$ to $\rad(I)$. There is a class of rings for which it's feasible to understand all *radical* ideals, and hopeless to understand *all* ideals. Example : Take $R = \CC[x]$, a PID. Suppose $I\normal R$ and $\rad(I) = x^n$, then $I = (x^n)$. So this is no big deal, it's just an extra integer parameter. Now instead take $R = \CC[x, y]$, and let $I = \generators{x, y}$. Note that applying (f) above to $J = \rad(I)$, we find that $I \supset \generators{x, y}^n$ for some $n$. But note that $$\generators{x, y}^n = \generators{x^n, x^{n-1}y, \cdots, xy^{n-1}, y^n}.$$ Exercise : Suppose $I \supset \generators{x ,y}^2$. For such $I$, $\dim_\CC R/I < \infty$. So for each $d$, try to find all ideals $I$ such that $\rad(I) = \generators{x, y}$ and $\dim_\CC R/I = d$. > Note that these correspond to "fat points" in algebraic geometry. > The idea $\generators{x, y}$ corresponds to a fat point at zero. > When doing AG, we hope to restrict attention entirely to radical ideals. Definition (Jacobson Radical) : The *Jacobson radical* is defined by $$\mcj(R) = \intersect_{\mfm \in \maxspec(R)} \mfm.$$ Fact : $\mcj(R) \supset \nil(R)$, since not every prime ideal is maximal. Example : If $(R, \mfm)$ is a local domain, then $\nil(R) = 0$ and $\mcj(R) = \mfm$. Exercise : Let $R$ be a domain, show that $\mcj(R[t]) = (0)$. Proposition (Characterization of Jacobson Radical in Terms of Units) : $x\in \mcj(R) \iff 1\pm xR \subset R\units$. Exercise : Show directly that $x^n = 0 \implies \forall y, 1-xy \in R\units$.