# Wednesday, October 13 :::{.remark} Result from last time: there doesn't exist a surjection $k\polynomialring{f_1,\cdots, f_m} \surjects k\powerseries{x}$ for any finite collection $\ts{f_i}_{i=1}^m$ of polynomials. This can be checked by just considering their dimension as a $k\dash$modules, where $\dim_k LHS = \# \NN$ and $\dim_k RHS = \# \RR$. We said that a morphism $X \mapsvia{f} Y$ is **locally finite type** if it is locally modeled on $\spec A\to \spec B$ with $B\to A$ a finitely-generated ring morphism, and is **finite** if locally modeled on $B \to A$ module-finite. Note that in the first case, we require $f\inv(U) \contains U\to V$, but in the latter $U = f\inv(V)$. ::: :::{.example title="?"} As an example, the map $D(x) \to \AA^1\slice k$ was not finite since $k[x] \to k[x, x\inv]$ is not module-finite, despite the fact that this geometrically corresponds to $\AA^1\smz \injects \AA^1$: \begin{tikzpicture} \fontsize{45pt}{1em} \node (node_one) at (0,0) { \import{/home/zack/SparkleShare/github.com/Notes/Class_Notes/2021/Fall/Schemes/sections/figures}{2021-10-13_11-41.pdf_tex} }; \end{tikzpicture} ::: :::{.example title="Not finite type: $\spec$ of a local ring of a variety"} Let $p \in V$ be a $k\dash$variety for $k$ an infinite field, which we can assume to be affine (so $\kxn/I$ for $I$ reduced). Then $\OO_{V, p}$ is not not finitely-generated as a $k\dash$algebra, and $\spec \OO_{V, p}\to \spec k$ is not of finite type. Consider the local ring of $\AA^1\slice k$ at the prime ideal $p \da \gens{x}$, then $k[x]\plocalize{p} = \ts{f/g \st g\not\in p}$, so $g(0) \neq 0$ for such $g$. Note that this is not $k[x] \localize{x}$! Idea: there are only finitely many denominators: if \[ \phi: k\polynomialring{f_1/g_1, \cdots, f_r/g_r} \surjects k[x]\plocalize{p} ,\] then $\im \phi$ contains contains those $f/g$ such that $V(g) \subseteq \union V(g_i)$, so such a $\phi$ can not exist. Note that this is still true for $k$ a finite field, just not by this proof. ::: ## Open/Closed Subschemes :::{.definition title="Open subschemes"} Given $X\in \Sch$, an **open subscheme** of $X$ is an open subset $U \subseteq \realize{X}$ with structure sheaf $\OO_U = \ro{\OO_X}{U}$. ::: :::{.remark} Why does $(U, \OO_U) \in \LRS$ form a scheme? One needs to check that it's locally isomorphic to the spectrum of a ring: let $\ts{X_i}\covers X$ be an open affine cover, then $U_i\da U \intersect X_i$ is open in $U$ and in $X_i$, so can be covered by distinguished opens $V_{ij}$. But then $\ts{V_{ij}}\covers U$ is a cover by affine schemes. The inclusion $(U, \OO_U) \injects (X, \OO_X)$ is clearly a morphism in $\LRS$. ::: :::{.definition title="Open Immersion"} The inclusion above is an **open immersion**. ::: :::{.remark} A small dictionary | AG | Rest of Math | |-----------|--------------| | Immersion | Embedding | | Nothing! | Immersion | ::: :::{.remark} Here I write $\realize{X} \da \mathrm{sp}(X)$ as an alternative for Hartshorne's notation. ::: :::{.definition title="Closed immersion"} A **closed immersion** is a morphism $X \mapsvia{f} Y\in \Sch$ such that 1. The induced map $\realize{X}\to \realize{Y} \in \Top$ is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset of $\realize{Y}$, 2. $f^\#: \OO_Y \surjects f_* \OO_X \in \Sh(Y)$ is surjective. ::: :::{.remark} Set $U = D(f) \subseteq \spec A$ defines an open immersion $\spec A\localize{f} \to \spec A$. So this corresponds to the ring map $A\injects A\localize{f}$ since $\spec A\localize{f} \subseteq \spec A$ are those ideals not containing $f$. ::: :::{.example title="?"} Consider $U \da \AA^2\slice k\sm\ts{\tv{x, y}} \injects \AA^2\slice k$. Then $\ts{\tv{x, y}} = V(x, y)$, and this is a subscheme of an affine scheme which is not itself affine. One can use that $\dim D(f)^c \geq 1$ ::: :::{.exercise title="?"} Prove that this is not affine. Hint: check $\OO_U = k[x,y]$,[^closed_regular] and use that for any $X \in \Aff\Sch$ we have $\OO_X(X) = R$. However, $\spec k[x, y] = \AA^2\neq U$. [^closed_regular]: This says that any regular function on $U$ actually extends to all of $\AA^2$ ::: > Check "affinization"? It fills in holes of at codimension at most 2, and satisfies a universal property. > Consider $X = \AA^1\times \PP^1$. :::{.remark} All examples are locally of this form: $F:X\injects Y = \spec A$ where $\realize{X}\to U \subseteq \realize{Y}$ maps homeomorphically onto a closed subset. Recall that the closed subsets are of the form $U = V(I)$, and here we need $f^\#: \OO_Y \to f_* \OO_X$ surjective. Let $X = \spec A/I$, and recall that every surjective ring map is of the form $A\to A/I$. Here $q: A\surjects A/I$ where $\mfp \mapsfrom q\inv(\mfp)$, so we get some map $\spec A/I\to \spec A$, and this is homeomorphism onto $V(I) \subseteq \spec A$: \[ \spec A/I &\to V(I) \\ \mfp &\mapsto q\inv(\mfp) \contains I \\ q(\mfq) &\mapsfrom \mfq .\] We also get an induced map $A\localize{g} \to (A/I)\localize{g}$, which is precisely \[ f^\#(D(g)): \OO_Y(D(g)) \to \OO_X(f\inv(D(g))) \] and is thus surjective. Since it's surjective on a basis, by gluing it'll be surjective on the entire space. :::