# Tuesday, January 12 ## Background From Phil's email: Personally, I found the following online references particularly useful: - Dietmar Salamon: Spin Geometry and Seiberg-Witten Invariants [@Dietmar99] - Richard Mandelbaum: Four-dimensional Topology: An Introduction [@Mandelbaum1980] - This book has a nice introduction to surgery aspects of four-manifolds, but as a warning: It was published right before Freedman's famous theorem. For instance, the existence of an exotic R^4 was not known. This actually makes it quite useful, as a summary of what was known before, and provides the historical context in which Freedman's theorem was proven. - Danny Calegari: Notes on 4-Manifolds [@Calegari] - Yuli Rudyak: Piecewise Linear Structures on Topological Manifolds [@Rudyak] - Akhil Mathew: The Dirac Operator [@Matthew] - Tom Weston: An Introduction to Cobordism Theory [@Weston] A wide variety of lecture notes on the Atiyah-Singer index theorem, which are available online. ## Introduction :::{.definition title="Topological Manifold"} Recall that a **topological manifold** (or $C^0$ manifold) $X$ is a Hausdorff topological space *locally homeomorphic* to $\RR^n$ with a countable topological base, so we have charts $\phi_u: U\to \RR^n$ which are homeomorphisms from open sets covering $X$. ::: :::{.example title="The circle"} $S^1$ is covered by two charts homeomorphic to intervals: \begin{tikzpicture} \node (node_one) at (0,0) { \fontsize{45pt}{1em} \import{/home/zack/SparkleShare/github.com/Notes/Class_Notes/2021/Spring/FourManifolds/sections/figures/}{2021-01-16_21-54.pdf_tex} }; \end{tikzpicture} ::: :::{.remark} Maps that are merely continuous are poorly behaved, so we may want to impose extra structure. This can be done by imposing restrictions on the transition functions, defined as \[ t_{uv} \da \varphi_V \to \varphi_U ^{-1} : \varphi_U(U \intersect V) \to \varphi_V(U \intersect V) .\] ::: :::{.definition title="Restricted Structures on Manifolds"} \envlist - We say $X$ is a **PL manifold** if and only if $t_{UV}$ are piecewise-linear. Note that an invertible PL map has a PL inverse. - We say $X$ is a **$C^k$ manifold** if they are $k$ times continuously differentiable, and **smooth** if infinitely differentiable. - We say $X$ is **real-analytic** if they are locally given by convergent power series. - We say $X$ is **complex-analytic** if under the identification $\RR^n \cong \CC^{n/2}$ if they are holomorphic, i.e. the differential of $t_{UV}$ is complex linear. - We say $X$ is a **projective variety** if it is the vanishing locus of homogeneous polynomials on $\CP^N$. ::: :::{.remark} Is this a strictly increasing hierarchy? It's not clear e.g. that every $C^k$ manifold is PL. ::: :::{.question} Consider $\RR^n$ as a topological manifold: are any two smooth structures on $\RR^n$ diffeomorphic? ::: :::{.remark} Fix a copy of $\RR$ and form a single chart $\RR \mapsvia{\id} \RR$. There is only a single transition function, the identity, which is smooth. But consider \[ X &\to \RR \\ t &\mapsto t^3 .\] This is also a smooth structure on $X$, since the transition function is the identity. This yields a different smooth structure, since these two charts don't like in the same maximal atlas. Otherwise there would be a transition function of the form $t_{VU}: t\mapsto t^{1/3}$, which is not smooth at zero. However, the map \[ X &\to X \\ t &\mapsto t^3 .\] defines a diffeomorphism between the two smooth structures. ::: :::{.claim} $\RR$ admits a unique smooth structure. ::: :::{.proof title="sketch"} Let $\tilde \RR$ be some exotic $\RR$, i.e. a smooth manifold homeomorphic to $\RR$. Cover this by coordinate charts to the standard $\RR$: \begin{tikzpicture} \node (node_one) at (0,0) { \import{/home/zack/SparkleShare/github.com/Notes/Class_Notes/2021/Spring/FourManifolds/sections/figures}{2021-01-16_22-31.pdf_tex} }; \end{tikzpicture} :::{.fact} There exists a cover which is *locally finite* and supports a *partition of unity*: a collection of smooth functions $f_i: U_i \to \RR$ with $f_i \geq 0$ and $\supp f \subseteq U_i$ such that $\sum f_i = 1$ (*i.e., bump functions*). It is also a purely topological fact that $\tilde \RR$ is orientable. ::: So we have bump functions: \begin{tikzpicture} \node (node_one) at (0,0) { \import{/home/zack/SparkleShare/github.com/Notes/Class_Notes/2021/Spring/FourManifolds/sections/figures}{2021-01-16_22-37.pdf_tex} }; \end{tikzpicture} Take a smooth vector field $V_i$ on $U_i$ everywhere aligning with the orientation. Then $\sum f_i V_i$ is a smooth nowhere vector field on $X$ that is nowhere zero in the direction of the orientation. Taking the associated flow \[ \RR &\to \tilde \RR \\ t &\mapsto \varphi(t) .\] such that \( \varphi'(t) = V(\varphi(t)) \). Then \( \varphi \) is a smooth map that defines a diffeomorphism. This follows from the fact that the vector field is everywhere positive. ::: :::{.slogan} To understand smooth structures on $X$, we should try to solve differential equations on $X$. ::: :::{.remark} Note that here we used the existence of a global frame, i.e. a trivialization of the tangent bundle, so this doesn't quite work for e.g. $S^2$. ::: :::{.question} What is the difference between all of the above structures? Are there obstructions to admitting any particular one? ::: :::{.answer} \envlist 1. (Munkres) Every $C^1$ structure gives a unique $C^k$ and $C^ \infty$ structure.[^note_note_c0] 2. (Grauert) Every $C^ \infty$ structure gives a unique real-analytic structure. 3. Every PL manifold admits a smooth structure in $\dim X \leq 7$, and it's unique in $\dim X\leq 6$, and above these dimensions there exists PL manifolds with no smooth structure. 4. (Kirby-Siebenmann) Let $X$ be a topological manifold of $\dim X\geq 5$, then there exists a cohomology class $\ks(X) \in H^4(X; \ZZ/2\ZZ)$ which is 0 if and only if $X$ admits a PL structure. Moreover, if $\ks(X) = 0$, then (up to concordance) the set of PL structures is given by $H^3(X; \ZZ/2\ZZ)$. 5. (Moise) Every topological manifold in $\dim X\leq 3$ admits a unique smooth structure. 6. (Smale et al.): In $\dim X\geq 5$, the number of smooth structures on a topological manifold $X$ is finite. In particular, $\RR^n$ for $n \neq 4$ has a unique smooth structure. So dimension 4 is interesting! 7. (Taubes) $\RR^4$ admits uncountably many non-diffeomorphic smooth structures. 8. A compact oriented smooth surface \( \Sigma \), the space of complex-analytic structures is a complex orbifold [^orbifold] of dimension $3g-2$ where $g$ is the genus of \( \Sigma \), up to biholomorphism (i.e. *moduli*). [^note_note_c0]: Note that this doesn't start at $C^0$, so topological manifolds are genuinely different! There exist topological manifolds with no smooth structure. [^orbifold]: Locally admits a chart to $\CC^n/ \Gamma$ for \( \Gamma \) a finite group. ::: :::{.remark} Kervaire-Milnor: $S^7$ admits 28 smooth structures, which form a group. :::