# Monday, September 19 ## Proof of Weyl's theorem (continued) :::{.remark} Recall: we're proving Weyl's theorem, i.e. every finite-dimensional representation of semisimple Lie algebra over $\CC$ is completely reducible. Strategy: show every $W \leq_L V$ has a complement $W'' \leq_L V$ such that $V = W \oplus W''$; induct on $\dim V$. ::: :::{.proof title="of Weyl's theorem, continued"} **Case I**: $\dim V/W = 1$. **Case 1**: $W$ is reducible. We got $0 < W' < W < V$ (proper submodules), represented schematically by a triangle. We showed $V/W' \cong W/W' \oplus \tilde W/W'$, since - $\tilde W \intersect W \subseteq W'$, - $V= W + \tilde W + W' = W + \tilde W$ since $W' \subseteq W$. - $\tilde W = W' \oplus X$ for some submodule $X \leq_L \tilde W \leq_L V$. Thus replacing $\tilde W$ in the second point yields $V = W + \tilde W = W + W' +X = W + X$; we want to prove this sum is direct. Since $X$ is contained in $\tilde W$, we can write \[ X \intersect W &= (X \intersect \tilde W) \intersect W \\ &= X \intersect (\tilde W \intersect W) \qquad\text{by 1}\\ &\subseteq X \intersect W' = 0 \qquad \text{by 2} ,\] so $V = W \oplus X$. **Case 2**: Let $c_\phi$ be the Casimir element of $\phi$, and note that $c_\phi(W) \subseteq W$ since $c_\phi$ is built out of endomorphisms in $\phi(L)$ sending $W$ to $W$ (since $W$ is a submodule). In fact, $\phi(L)(V) = W$ since $V/W$ is a 1-dimensional representation of the semisimple Lie algebra $L$, hence trivial. Thus $c_\phi(V) \subseteq W$ and thus $\ker c_\phi \neq 0$ since $W < V$ is proper. Note also that $c_\phi$ commutes with anything in $c_\phi(L)$ on $V$, and so defines a morphism $c_\phi \in\mods{L}(V, V)$ and $\ker c_\phi \leq_L V$. On the other hand, $c_\phi$ induces an element of $\Endo_{L}(W)$, and since $W$ is irreducible, $\ro{c_\phi}{W} = \lambda \id_W$ for some scalar $\lambda$. This can't be zero, since $\trace(\ro{c_\phi}{W}) = {\dim L \over \dim W} > 0$, so $\ker c_\phi \intersect W = 0$. Since $\codim_V W = 1$, i.e. $\dim W = \dim V - 1$, we must have $\dim \ker c_\phi = 1$ and we have a direct sum decomposition $V = W \oplus \ker c_\phi$. > Use of the Casimir element in basic Lie theory: producing a complement to an irreducible submodule. **Case 2**: Suppose $0 < W < V$ with $W$ any nontrivial $L\dash$submodule; there is a SES \( W \injects V \surjects V/W \) Consider $H \da \hom_\CC(V, W)$, then $H \in \lmod$ by $(x.f)(v) \da x.(f(v)) - f(x.v)$ for $f\in H, x\in L, v\in V$. Let $\mcv \da \ts{f \st H \st \ro f W = \alpha \id_W \,\text{ for some } \alpha \in \CC} \subseteq H$. For $f\in V$ and $w\in W$, we have \[ (x.f)(w) = x.f(w) - f(x.w) = \alpha x.w - \alpha x.w = 0 .\] So let $\mcw \da \ts{f\in \mcv \st f(W) = 0} \subseteq \mcv$, then we've shown that $L.\mcv \subseteq \mcw$. Now roughly, the complement is completely determined by the scalar. Rigorously, since $\dim \mcv/\mcw = 1$, any $f\in \mcv$ is determined by the scalar $\ro{f}{W} = \alpha \id_W$: we have $f-\alpha \chi_W \in \mcw$ where $\chi_W$ is any extension of $\id_W$ to $V$ which is zero on $V/W$, e.g. by extending a basis and having it act by zero on the new basis elements. Now $\mcw \injects \mcv \surjects \mcv/\mcw \in \lmod$ with $\codim_\mcv \mcw = 1$. By Case I, $\mcv = \mcw \oplus \mcw''$ for some complement $L\dash$submodule $\mcw''$. Let $f: V\to W$ span $\mcw''$, then $\ro f W$ is a nonzero scalar -- a scalar since it's in $\mcv$, and nonzero since it's in the complement of $\mcw$. By rescaling, we can assume the scalar is 1, so $\im f = W$ and by rank-nullity $\dim \ker f = \dim V - \dim W$. Thus $\ker f$ has the right dimension to be the desired complement. It is an $L\dash$submodule, since $L.f \subseteq \mcw'' \intersect \mcw = 0$ since $\mcw''$ is an $L\dash$submodule and $f\in \mcw$ since $L.\mcv \subseteq \mcw$. Noting that if $(x.f) = 0$ then $x.(f(v)) = f(x.v)$, making $f$ an $\lmod$ morphism. Thus $W'' \da \ker f \leq_L V$, and $W \intersect W'' = 0$ so $\ro f W = \id_W$. Since the dimensions add up correctly, we get $V = W \oplus W''$. ::: ## 6.4: Preservation of Jordan decomposition :::{.theorem title="?"} Let $L \leq \liegl(V)$ be a subalgebra with $L$ semisimple and finite-dimensional. Given $x\in L$, there are two decompositions: the usual JCF $x = s + n$, and the abstract decomposition $\ad_x = \ad_{x_s} + \ad_{x_n}$. $L$ contains the semisimple and nilpotent parts of all of its elements, and in particular the two above decompositions coincide. ::: :::{.proof title="Idea"} The proof is technical, but here's a sketch: - Construct a subspace $L \leq L' \leq_L \liegl(V)$ such that $l'$ contains the semisimple and nilpotent parts of all elements where $L\actson \liegl(V)$ by $\ad: L\to \liegl(\liegl(V))$. - Check $L' \lieq N_{\liegl(V)}(L)$ (the normalizer), so $[LL'] \subseteq L$. - Show $L' = L$: - If $L'\neq L$, use Weyl's theorem to get a complement with $L' = L \oplus M$. - Check $[LM] \subseteq [LL'] \subseteq L$ and $[LM] \subseteq M$ since $M\leq_L M$, forcing $[LM] \subseteq L \intersect M = 0$. - Use Weyl's theorem on all of $V$ splits it into sums of irreducibles, bracket against the irreducibles, and use specific properties of this $L'$ to show $M = 0$. - Since $s, n\in L$ when $x=s+n$ and $\ad_x = \ad_s + \ad_n = \ad_{x_s} + \ad_{x_n}$, the result follows from uniqueness of the abstract JCF that $s=x_s, n=x_n$ (using that $\ad$ is injective when $L$ is semisimple since $Z(L) = 0$). ::: :::{.corollary title="?"} If $L \in \Lie\Alg\slice \CC^{\ss}$ (not necessarily linear) and $\phi\in \lmod$, writing $x=s+n$ the abstract Jordan decomposition, $\phi(x) = \phi(s) + \phi(n)$ is the usual JCF of $\phi(x)\in \liegl(V)$. ::: :::{.proof title="Sketch"} Consider $\ad_{\phi(L)}\phi(s)$ and $\ad_{\phi(L)}\phi(n)$, which are semisimple (acts on a vector space and decomposes into a direct sum of eigenspaces) and nilpotent respectively and commute, yielding the abstract Jordan decomposition of $\ad_{\phi(x)}$. Now apply the theorem. :::