# Friday, January 21 :::{.remark} Last time: definitions of presheaves and sheaves. There is an adjunction \[ \adjunction{(\wait)^+}{\Forget}{\Presh(X)}{\Sh(X)} .\] Recall that constant sheaves for $A\in \cat{D}$ are defined as $\ul{A}(\wait) \da \Hom_\Top(\wait, A)$ where $A$ is equipped with the discrete topology. ::: :::{.exercise title="?"} What is $\Gamma(\ul{A}, X)$ for $X\da\ts{1/n}_{n\in \ZZ_{\geq 0}} \subseteq \RR$? So $A(U) \neq A^{\size \pi_0 U}$ in general, since there may not be a notion of connected components for an arbitrary topological space. ::: :::{.exercise title="?"} Is it true that for any $X\in \Top$ there is a unique decomposition $X = \disjoint_{i\in I} U_i$ into connected components? > Hint: form a poset of such decompositions ordered by refinement and apply Zorn's lemma. ::: :::{.example title="?"} Consider the following poset with a prescribed topology, and applying some functor $F$: ![](figures/2022-01-21_10-49-22.png) For this to be a sheaf, this forces - $F(\emptyset) = \terminal$ - $F_{12} \cong F_1 \oplus F_2$ by the universal property of $\oplus$ if this is to be a sheaf. - $F_3$ can be anything mapping to $F_{12}$. What are the stalks? - $F_x = F(X)$ for $x=3$, since $X$ is the smallest open set containing $3$. - $F_{x_i} = F_i$ for $x_i = 1, 2$. ::: :::{.example title="?"} Consider now a poset in the order topology: ![](figures/2022-01-21_10-57-13.png) Now $F$ is a sheaf iff $F_{124}\cong F_1 \fiberprod{F_4}F_2$ is the fiber product. ::: :::{.definition title="Sheaf space"} A map $\pi: Y\to X \in \Top$ is a **sheaf space** if it is a local homeomorphism, so every $y\in Y$ admits a neighborhood $U_y\ni y$ where $\ro{\pi}{U_y}: U_y\to \pi(U_y)$ is a homeomorphism onto its image. ::: :::{.example title="?"} Some examples: - $X\times A\to X$ for $A$ discrete. ![](figures/2022-01-21_11-04-47.png) ::: :::{.example title="?"} One possibility: "jumping". Take $Y \da X\Disjoint_{X\smz} X$ for $X\subseteq \RR$, which is a version of the line with two zeros. Then $Y\to X$ is a sheaf space, since it is a local homeomorphism. The other possibility is "skipping": ![](figures/2022-01-21_11-10-26.png) ::: :::{.remark} These two definitions of sheaf coincide: for new to old, given $Y \mapsvia{\pi} X$ apply $\mathrm{ContSec}_\pi \subseteq \Hom_\Top(X, Y)$. In the other direction, define $Y\da \Disjoint_{x\in X} F_x$ and prove it is a local homeomorphism. ::: :::{.remark} Next time: direct/inverse image, shriek functors, sheaves of modules. :::